Why should they do it? Gun Control Argument Essay Gun control pros and cons essay control has become a very big problem with people in the United States, with all the reasoning on why the government are putting tighter laws on guns. When looking into who would stop these people, another person with a gun is the answer. Gun controls history dates back inwhen the second amendment of the constitution was ratified. If guns are taken away, only the good people won't have them. People are easier to control when they are disarmed, gun control is not about the gun, but is it about control.
Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade
Currently, the American constitution does not have laws limiting gun ownership rights. However, there are two opposing sides of the discussion of whether the government should create such laws Wuest, On the other hand, opponents of gun argue that the forefathers of the USA in their creation of the Second Amendment accorded all Americans exclusive rights to own a gun. The opponents and proponents of gun control issue various reasons and justifications for their opinions and perspectives. These views have been used as the basis for the enactment and amendments of Gun Control laws. According to ProCon. orgthere are approximately, guns in the United States of America. This is currently the highest number in any country.
The high number of Americans with guns is partly due to the revolutionary history, whereby the country has gun control pros and cons essay through a culture in support of regulated militia, Free State, and self-protection, gun control pros and cons essay. Regarding this, the Second Amendment is a section of the US constitution that outlines the liberties of owning a g. un in the United States. These statistics reflect an almost neutral view, gun control pros and cons essay. These statistics show massive support for gun ownership. Some factors have been attributed to the change in perspectives of Americans on the issue of gun ownership.
There are political, social, and political factors attributable to this change in trends. Social factors include changes in levels of crime, demography, and living standards for Americans. On the other hand, political influences include policies gun control pros and cons essay the exercise of personal duty for all Americans according to the current Gun control pros and cons essay or Local governments. Graph comparing the number of citizens in support of gun control and those against it. Courtesy of Pew Research Centre The cost to State and Federal governments has also been an influencing factor on the issue of gun control. Opponents of gun control argue that the move is a wasteful decision that has already cost the nation more than enough resources.
orgthe government has spent this wholesome amount through projects such as the Brady CentreCoalition to Stop. These projects spent these resources in creating awareness and campaigning for the move to control gun ownership. Opponents of gun control argue that controlling gun ownership is not a practical solution to crime and gun-related violence. Instead, this group argues that the police are mandated with the responsibility of reducing crime Lott, The opponents of gun control also associate gun crimes with weak ownership policies, meaning that the current law does not ensure that only the qualified individuals get the authority to own a gun. Due to this weak and poorly coordinated gun authorization, more criminals continue to own more guns.
Therefore, limiting gun ownership rights would not be a workable solution and, hence, there is no need to control gun ownership Wuest, Proponents of gun control majorly comprise human activists, non-governmental organizations, and religious groups. According to this group, the idea the creators of the Second Amendment had was not full ownership rights but rather controlled liberties. Hence, these early lawmakers were creating a country where the people had equal rights, and they held the responsibility of protecting the country and their property from both local and foreign enemies. Proponents of gun control argue that American law enforcers misinterpreted the gun ownership liberties to mean that all people had irreversible exclusive rights on the issue of gun ownership.
Hence, the proponents argue that the American constitution protects gun control pros and cons essay gun owners. Other proponents of gun control argue on the impact of the move in reducing risk to the society, particularly the households with guns. The Centre for Disease Control CDC conducted one such campaign where it promoted a change in gun ownership rights because they increased risk in the home. According to these study findings, the households that had guns were more likely to have at least one member with a gun-related criminal record. Legal calls to create gun control laws have in the past been instigated by rising crime rate or gun-related deaths.
One of the most significant. Home Page Social Issues Human Rights Gun Control Gun Gun Control Pros and Cons. Available Only on StudyHippo. GunGun ControlSecond amendment. Pages: 4 words Published: December 30, View Entire Sample Download Sample. Text preview. Contents Introduction Conclusion References. View entire sample Join StudyHippo to see entire essay, gun control pros and cons essay. Related assignments. Popular Essay Topics. Get ideas now.
essay on plastic surgery
These statistics reflect an almost neutral view. These statistics show massive support for gun ownership. Some factors have been attributed to the change in perspectives of Americans on the issue of gun ownership. There are political, social, and political factors attributable to this change in trends. Social factors include changes in levels of crime, demography, and living standards for Americans. On the other hand, political influences include policies of the exercise of personal duty for all Americans according to the current State or Local governments. Graph comparing the number of citizens in support of gun control and those against it.
Courtesy of Pew Research Centre The cost to State and Federal governments has also been an influencing factor on the issue of gun control. Opponents of gun control argue that the move is a wasteful decision that has already cost the nation more than enough resources. org , the government has spent this wholesome amount through projects such as the Brady Centre , Coalition to Stop. These projects spent these resources in creating awareness and campaigning for the move to control gun ownership. Opponents of gun control argue that controlling gun ownership is not a practical solution to crime and gun-related violence. Instead, this group argues that the police are mandated with the responsibility of reducing crime Lott, The opponents of gun control also associate gun crimes with weak ownership policies, meaning that the current law does not ensure that only the qualified individuals get the authority to own a gun.
Due to this weak and poorly coordinated gun authorization, more criminals continue to own more guns. Therefore, limiting gun ownership rights would not be a workable solution and, hence, there is no need to control gun ownership Wuest, Proponents of gun control majorly comprise human activists, non-governmental organizations, and religious groups. According to this group, the idea the creators of the Second Amendment had was not full ownership rights but rather controlled liberties. Hence, these early lawmakers were creating a country where the people had equal rights, and they held the responsibility of protecting the country and their property from both local and foreign enemies. Proponents of gun control argue that American law enforcers misinterpreted the gun ownership liberties to mean that all people had irreversible exclusive rights on the issue of gun ownership.
Hence, the proponents argue that the American constitution protects criminal gun owners. Other proponents of gun control argue on the impact of the move in reducing risk to the society, particularly the households with guns. The Centre for Disease Control CDC conducted one such campaign where it promoted a change in gun ownership rights because they increased risk in the home. According to these study findings, the households that had guns were more likely to have at least one member with a gun-related criminal record. Both sides want to stop the problem of gun violence, but protecting gun rights is the only way to truly insure public safety.
Gun control will not be able to stop the use of guns, and it will put citizens in an unfair situation where they cannot protect themselves. If guns were out of the picture the generalization of those people would not be an issue. However, she does not place her faith in the government doing an adequate job of controlling the guns in the United States, instead, she wants an all-out ban because it seems to be the only logical solutions to the shootings in the United States. Furthermore, Bovy believes the issue is too complicated to just put a ban on certain guns. If people are still allowed to…. Gun control has become a very big problem with people in the United States, with all the reasoning on why the government are putting tighter laws on guns.
Some people have made poor choices with guns and it has made the government start to think on how they can make it to where there is more control over guns without having to take guns away completely. Even though some people believe that guns should go away completely and some believe that there should be no gun control whatsoever. The second amendment keeps the government from taking away guns completely because people have the right to bear arms. As a nationwide community, the school shootings such as Sandy Hook and the Virginia Tech massacre showed us what can happen when just anyone has the ability to get ahold of guns. Liberals want gun rights to be taken away, while most conservatives….
Your normal citizen doesn't have drugs, but bad people do. If guns are taken away, only the good people won't have them. Ronald Cruise. The gun control law is not being followed by some citizens, therefore more rules are being added to the law towards gun control a good background check will keep the guns out of people who should not have them to prevent criminal, drug dealers, domestic abusers, and mentally ill people from carrying the gun. therefore, people who do not follow this law should face consequences, for example, time in jail or police taking gun licene from guns holder. Gun Control: Is There Such a Thing? Guns and gun control have always been a topic that separates our country into groups of opposing views on the matter. Many Americans feel as though stricter gun laws and regulations on the sale of guns will decrease the amount of gun violence.
While others believe, such laws and regulations would be a violation to their second amendment right to bear arms. In simplicity, I do not believe all guns should be banned. Do we need more gun control? Gun use is already so common, that taking them away would have a bad effect on the population, and could cause bursts of outrage, protests and more. Some families use their guns to get their food. Others use them for protection. So even if the government wanted to take guns away, people are going to protest on the fact that they use their guns for useful, non-violent purposes. Not everyone uses their guns to try and hurt people. Concealed carry is a law that has been in controversy for several decades. A majority of people say that not being able to carry a gun is violating their rights.
Others say that they don 't feel safe when there are guns around and can cause more harm than good. The use of concealed and carry weapons could reduce the number of mass shootings by making criminals not want to commit the crimes because the people who are armed would be able to defend themselves. To understand concealed and carry, people need to understand what gun control really is. Home Flashcards Create Flashcards Essays Essay Topics Writing Tool. Essays Essays FlashCards.
No comments:
Post a Comment